Associations between postoperative analgesic consumption and distress tolerance, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing: a prospective observational study

Abstract Background Patients' postoperative treatment might be affected by their psychological state. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of anxiety, coping ability (stress tolerance), depression, and pain catastrophizing on analgesic consumption in patients scheduled for sleeve gastrectomy. Methods This prospective observational study consisted of 72 patients. The Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) were completed in the preoperative period. In the postoperative period, pain intensity, as measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and morphine consumption (mg) were evaluated after 2, 6, 8, and 24 hours. Total morphine consumption was recorded. Results The results revealed a strong negative correlation between distress tolerance and postoperative total morphine consumption (r = -0.702, p< 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between total morphine consumption and pain catastrophizing (r = 0.801, p< 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was observed between total morphine consumption and anxiety and between total morphine consumption and depression (r = 0.511, p< 0.001; r = 0.556, p< 0.001, respectively). Linear regression revealed that distress tolerance, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing are predictors of postoperative morphine consumption (β = 0.597, p< 0.001; β = 0.207, p= 0.036; β = 0.140, p= 0.208; β = 0.624, p< 0.001, respectively). Conclusions Distress tolerance, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing can be predictive of postoperative analgesic consumption. In the estimation of postoperative analgesic consumption, distress tolerance, as well as anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing, were found to be important predictors.

Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale for acute low back pain / Propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da Escala de Catastrofização da Dor para dor lombar aguda

Measurement instruments of pain catastrophizing for middle-aged and elderly individuals are needed to understand its impact on low back pain. The goals were to cross-culturally adapt the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, assess the construct validity through Rasch analysis, and verify reliability and convergent validity of pain catastrophizing with psychosocial factors. 131 individuals aged 55 years and older with acute low back pain were interviewed . The intra-rater reliability was Kp = 0.80 and interrater Kp = 0.75. The Rasch analysis found adequate reliability coefficients (0.95 for items and 0.90 for individuals ). The separation index for the elderly was 2.95 and 4.59 items. Of the 13 items, one did not fit the model, which was justified in the sample evaluated. The pain catastrophizing correlated with most psychosocial factors. The instrument proved to be clinically useful. Subsequent studies should carry out the same analysis in different populations.

Instrumentos de medida da catastrofização da dor para indivíduos de meia-idade e idosos são necessários para compreensão do impacto na dor lombar nessa população. Os objetivos foram adaptar transculturalmente a Escala de Catastrofização da Dor, avaliar a validade de construto pela análise Rasch, verificar a confiabilidade e a validade convergente da catastrofização da dor com fatores psicossociais. Participaram 131 indivíduos comunitários com 55 anos e mais com dor lombar aguda. A confiabilidade intra-examinadores foi de Kp = 0,80 e inter-examinadores Kp = 0,75. A análise Rasch, detectou adequados coeficientes de confiabilidade (0,95 para itens e 0,90 para indivíduos). O índice de separação dos idosos foi de 2,95 e dos itens 4,59. Dos 13 itens, um não se enquadrou no modelo, o que se justificou na amostra avaliada. A catastrofização da dor se correlacionou com a maioria dos fatores psicossociais. O instrumento mostrou-se clinicamente útil. Estudos subsequentes devem proceder às mesmas análises em diferentes populações.